Epstein File Explorer
Overview
Documents
Network
Analysis
About
Overview
Documents
Search
Collections
Network
Entities
Graph
Map
Analysis
Analytics
Compare
About
Updates
MCP
About & Legal
Back to data-set-11
EFTA02365823.pdf
PDF
403.9 KB
5 pages
Extracted Chars
11,119
Entities
15
Relationships
8
Loading extracted text...
Mentioned Entities
15
Jeffrey Epstein
Person
Associate
3 mentions
Royal Palms Professional Building
Address
1 mention
Thatch Cay
Property
1 mention
Tract 2
Property
1 mention
Tract 1
Property
1 mention
Parcel 11
Property
1 mention
GSJLLC
Organization
Company
1 mention
Shep Barrows
Person
Witness
1 mention
Erika Kellerhals
Person
Attorney
1 mention
DKI PLLC
Organization
Company
1 mention
[email protected]
Communication
PhoneNumber
1 mention
Great St. James Island
Property
1 mention
Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC
Organization
LawFirm
1 mention
Internal Revenue Service
Organization
GovernmentAgency
1 mention
Kevin
Person
Enabler
1 mention
Relationships
8
Jeffrey Epstein
→
financial
→
[email protected]
"The informat=on contained in this communication is confidential... It is the property of JEE ... return e-mail o= by e-mail to
[email protected]
"
Erika Kellerhals
→
employment
→
Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC
"Erika A. Kellerhals Member Kellerhals Ferguson Kroblin PLLC"
Erika Kellerhals
→
communication
→
Jeffrey Epstein
"From: Erika Kellerhals Sent: Friday, March 11, 2016 12:45 PM To: jeffrey E."
Erika Kellerhals
→
legal
→
Jeffrey Epstein
"As for Kevin's point about whether or not you have standing - you have standing for various reasons"
Kevin
→
legal
→
Jeffrey Epstein
"Generally, in a suit to enforce a restrictive covenant, the party seeking enforcement must demonstrate that the covenant was made to for its benefit. "
Erika Kellerhals
→
communication
→
Shep Barrows
"Shep Barrows agreed to do a bit more digging on it to get a more realistic value"
Jeffrey Epstein
→
financial
→
GSJLLC
"I think GSJLLC could just purchase a crappy piece of property... and sue to enforce the covenant that way"
GSJLLC
→
property
→
Great St. James Island
"found that GSJLLC is not a benefitted party... because GSJ is a benefited parcel"
EFTA02365823.pdf | Epstein File Explorer